Dialogue

Can we question, not knowing, immediately together, carefully dialogue as the mirror of heartfelt relationship?

For example, possible uncomfortable interfacing with the moment allows consideration of discomfort per se as the context of not only timeless spatial silence but also neutral energy underpinning apparently initially discomforting relationship, for example the core of not understanding . This may allow silence to (and careful sensitive energy to previous discomfort) unfold. Such unfolding actually dissolves the seeming discomfort. Is silence and space questioning, open and carefully affectionate to all without assertion or dogma?

In or rather as Dialogue one, we dialogue ourselves, as least initially and present in this mirror as immediate relationship. Truth is not memory but discovery, not knowing.

Psychologically dying to a seemingly real personal self as dialogue, questioning, and collectively affectionately absenting everything? Is vulnerable sensitivity then; not knowing to or as oneself, intelligently, caringly unfolding as not knowing, questioning collectively as all?

Spatial silence timelessly ending yet present as ending; reborning as spatial silence. Ending as not knowing is, not me  always beginning. More directly new without continuity or episode. The blooming of joining both personal and collective in ending either relationship as all one, carefully alone everywhere, every one dialogue.

Here The term ‘dialogue’ derives from the Greek ‘dialogos’. It has two distinct parts: ‘dia’, meaning ‘through’, and ‘logos’, indicating ‘speech’ or ‘word’. Consequently, dialogue has traditionally meant ‘through words’ or ‘through speech’. This is typically understood as a discussion. Now however, within this community of hi,jk press enquirers, it represents something more deeply revelatory than conversation. Here, dialogue can signify a truly profound sense of questioning, uncovering, and exploring the selves (unknowing presence) of and as enquirers themselves; dialogue essentially is the dialoguer. In this sense, there may be impersonal, sensitive investigation, uncovering timeless insight into our human psyche itself, which is ordinarily bypassed and unexamined. Such sharing relationships may uncover insight as which personal pronouns like I, me, you and their singular, separative implications are carefully dialogued and non- authoritatively challenged. This sense of dialogue also significantly relates the non-human world as which stillness and the instance of spatial consciousness (even given the dualist propensity of words) actually is and also is not.