Dialogue

Can we question, not knowing, immediately together, carefully dialogue as the mirror of heartfelt relationship?

In, or rather as, dialogue, we dialogue ourselves, initially present in a mirror of relationship. Truth is not memory and is ongoing discovery, presently not knowing, as relationship?

The term ‘dialogue’ derives from the Greek ‘dialogos’. It has two distinct parts: ‘dia’, meaning ‘through’, and ‘logos’, indicating ‘speech’ or ‘word’. Consequently, dialogue has traditionally meant ‘through words’ or ‘through speech’. This is typically understood as a discussion. Now, however, within this community of hijk press enquirers, it represents something more deeply revelatory than memorised conversation or assertion.

Here, dialogue can signify a truly profound sense of questioning, uncovering, and exploring the selves of and as enquirers themselves; dialogue essentially is the dialoguer. In this sense, there may be impersonal, sensitive investigation, uncovering timeless insight into our shared human psyche itself. A psyche ordinarily singularised, bypassed and unexamined, assumed.

However, really sharing relationship may uncover wider insight, as personal pronouns like I, me, you and their singular, separative implications are carefully dialogued and non-authoritatively challenged.

Such immediate sense of dialogue also significantly relates the non-human world as which stillness and spatial consciousness actually is and questioningly is not.

Please see Events for awareness gathering, considering meetings and dialogue.